vspВопросы современной педиатрииCurrent Pediatrics1682-55271682-5535Издательство «ПедиатрЪ»10.15690/vsp.v20i3/2271vsp-2651Research ArticleОБЗОР ЛИТЕРАТУРЫREVIEWСистематическое обзорное исследование литературы по методологии scoping review: история, теория и практикаScoping Review Methodology: History, Theory and Practicehttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9880-1188КулаковаЕ. Н.KulakovaElena N.

Кулакова Елена Николаевна, кандидат медицинских наук, доцент кафедры госпитальной и поликлинической педиатрии

394036, Воронеж, ул. Студенческая, д. 10

Voronezh

elena.n.kulakova@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6096-1784НастаушеваТ. Л.NastaushevaTatjana L.

Воронеж

Voronezh

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7564-0382КондратьеваИ. В.KondratjevaInna V.

Воронеж

Voronezh

Воронежский государственный медицинский университет им. Н.Н. БурденкоРоссияVoronezh State Medical University named after N.N. BurdenkoRussian Federation202129062021203210222Copyright © Кулакова Е.Н., Настаушева Т.Л., Кондратьева И.В., 20212021Кулакова Е.Н., Настаушева Т.Л., Кондратьева И.В.Kulakova E.N., Nastausheva T.L., Kondratjeva I.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://vsp.spr-journal.ru/jour/article/view/2651

Количество обзорных публикаций увеличивается с каждым годом. Одним из относительно новых видов обзоров является систематическое исследование scoping review (ScR). В российской литературе имеются единичные примеры таких исследований. В связи с этим возрастает необходимость информирования русскоязычной аудитории об истории и эволюции ScR-методологии, этапах и особенностях выполнения исследования, актуальных международных руководствах. Соответствующие данные представлены в настоящем описательном обзоре (narrative review). Кроме того, выполнен перевод чек-листа PRISMA-ScR с учетом рекомендаций по переводу документов PRISMA. Проведен анализ опубликованных систематических исследований по ScR-методологии в области педиатрии и смежных дисциплин. Отмечено недостаточное использование авторами актуальных руководств по проведению и публикации ScR-исследований.

The number of literature reviews is growing every year. One relatively new type of review is the scoping review (ScR). Only a handful of such studies have been produced in Russian academia. It is, therefore, crucial to inform Russian-speaking audiences about the history and evolution of the ScR methodology, the stages and features of such a study, and relevant international guidelines. Relevant data is presented in this narrative review. A PRISMA-ScR checklist has also been translated, taking into account recommendations for the translation of PRISMA documents. ScR published in pediatrics and related fields have also been analyzed and it has been noted that the evaluated authors did not sufficiently follow current guidelines for writing ScR.

систематическое обзорное исследование литературыобзор предметного полясистематический обзорлитературный обзорметодологиячек-листscoping reviewmapping reviewsystematic reviewliterature reviewmethodologychecklistНе указанNot specifiedReferencesИвин А.А. Философское исследование науки: монография. — М.: Проспект; 2017. — 544 с.Ivin AA. Filosofskoe issledovanie nauki: Monografiya. Мoscow: Prospekt; 2017. 544 p. (In Russ).Поппер К. Логика научного исследования: пер. с англ. — М.: АСТ: Астрель; 2010. — 565 c.Popper K. Logic of scientific discovery: transl. from eng. Moscow: AST: Astrel’; 2010. 565 p. (In Russ).Де Пой Э., Гитлин Л.Н. Методы научных исследований в медицине и здравоохранении / пер. с англ. под ред. В.В. Власова. — М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2017. — 432 с.DePoy E, Gitlin LN. Introduction to Research. Understanding and applying multiple strategies. Transl. from engl., Vlasov VV, ed. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2017. 432 p. (In Russ).Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18(10):2119–2126. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18(10):2119–2126. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009; 26(2):91–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.xGrant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009; 26(2):91–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.xSutton A, Clowes M, Preston L, Booth A. Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements. Health Info Libr J. 2019;36(3):202–222. doi: 10.1111/hir.12276Sutton A, Clowes M, Preston L, Booth A. Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements. Health Info Libr J. 2019;36(3):202–222. doi: 10.1111/hir.12276Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:69. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:69. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16:15. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16:15. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32. doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32. doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, et al. Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews (2020 version). In: JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Aromataris E, Munn Z, eds). JBI, 2020. Available online: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global. Accessed on May 2, 2021. doi: 10.46658/JBIMES-20-12Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, et al. Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews (2020 version). In: JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Aromataris E, Munn Z, eds). JBI, 2020. Available online: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global. Accessed on May 2, 2021. doi: 10.46658/JBIMES-20-12Дулаев А.К., Кутянов Д.И., Желнов П.В., Брижань С.Л. Организация оказания медицинской помощи пациентам с заболеваниями позвоночника: опыт зарубежных стран (систематический «scoping»-обзор) // Гений ортопедии. — 2020. — Т. 26. — № 4. — С. 607–615. doi: 10.18019/1028-4427-2020-26-4-607-615Dulaev AK, Kutjanov DI, Zhelnov PV, Brizhan’ SL. Health-care resources to care for spinal conditions: international experience (a systematic scoping review). Genij ortopedii. 2020;26(4):607–615. (In Russ). doi: 10.18019/1028-4427-2020-26-4-607-615Кулакова Е.Н., Настаушева Т.Л., Кондратьева И.В. и др. Переход подростков с хронической болезнью почек во взрослую службу здравоохранения: систематическое обзорное исследование литературы // Вопросы современной педиатрии. — 2021. — Т. 20. — № 1. — С. 38–50. doi: 10.15690/vsp.v20i1.2235Kulakova EN, Nastausheva TL, Kondrat’eva IV, et al. Transition of adolescents with chronic kidney disease to adult health service: scoping review. Voprosy sovremennoi pediatrii — Current Pediatrics. 2021;20(1):38–50. (In Russ). doi: 10.15690/vsp.v20i1.2235Кулакова Е.Н., Настаушева Т.Л., Кондратьева И.В. Определение и критерии острой болезни почек: систематическое обзорное исследование литературы // Нефрология и диализ. — 2020. — Т. 22. — № 1. — С. 71–83. doi: 10.28996/2618-9801-2020-1-71-83Kulakova EN, Nastausheva TL, Kondrat’eva IV. Definition and criteria of acute kidney disease: scoping review. Nefrologija i dializ. 2020;22(1):71–83. (In Russ). doi: 10.28996/2618-9801-2020-1-71-83Балыхин М.Г., Косычева М.А. Обзор предметного поля как жанр научной коммуникации // Health, Food & Biotechnology. — 2020. — Т. 2. — № 1. — С. 7–10. doi: 10.36107/hfb.2020.i1.s284Balykhin MG, Kosycheva MA. Obzor predmetnogo polya kak zhanr nauchnoi kommunikatsii. Health, Food & Biotechnology. 2020;2(1):7–10. (In Russ). doi: 10.36107/hfb.2020.i1.s284Раицкая Л.К., Тихонова Е.В. Обзор как перспективный вид научной публикации, его типы и характеристики // Научный редактор и издатель. — 2019. — Т. 4. — № 3–4. — С. 131–139. doi: 10.24069/2542-0267-2019-3-4-131-139Raitskaya LK, Tikhonova EV. Reviews as a promising kind of scholarly publication, its types and characteristics. Nauchnyi Redaktor i Izdatel’ = Science Editor and Publisher. 2019;4(3–4):131–139. (In Russ). doi: 10.24069/2542-0267-2019-3-4-131-139Раицкая Л.К., Тихонова Е.В. Обзор обзоров как инструмент выявления трендов в исследуемой области знания // Высшее образование в России. — 2020. — Т. 29. — № 3. — С. 37–57. doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-3-37-57Raitskaya LK, Tikhonova EV. Obzor obzorov kak instrument vyyavleniya trendov v issleduemoi oblasti znaniya. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2020;29(3):37–57. (In Russ). doi: 10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-3-37-57Мильчаков К.С. Проведение информационных исследований в медицине: советы по стратегиям и ресурсам обзора литературы // Наука и здравоохранение. — 2019. — Т. 21. — № 3. — С. 68–76.Milchakov KS. Doing an information study in medicine: tips about strategies and recourses for literature review. Science & Healthcare. 2019;21(3):68–76. (In Russ).Тишкина С.Н., Мацкевич В.Е., Ледовских Ю.А. и др. Нормативно-правовое регулирование обеспечения оказания медицинской помощи по профилю «онкология» // Фармакоэкономика Совре менная Фармакоэкономика и Фармакоэпидемиология. — 2020. — Т. 12. — № 3. — С. 304–315. doi:10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2020.052.Tishkina SN, Matskevich VE, Ledovskikh JuA, et al. Regulatory framework of the oncological medical care provision. Farmakoekonomika. Sovremennaya farmakoeko nomika i farmakoepidemiologiya = Farmakoekonomika. Modern Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology 2020;12(3):304–315. (In Russ). doi:10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2020.052.Европейское региональное бюро Всемирной организации здравоохранения. Аналитический Обзор Организации Предоставления Услуг Здравоохранения в Кыргызской Респуб лике: О Чем Говорят Факты. — Всемирная организация здравоохранения; 2018. — 69 с. Доступно по: https://www.euro.who.int/ru/health-topics/Health-systems/primary-health-care/publications/2018/a-scoping-review-on-health-services-delivery-in-kyrgyzstan-what-does-the-evidence-tell-us-2018. Ссылка активна на 10.05.2021.The Regional Office for Europe of the World Health Organization. A scoping review on health services delivery in Kyrgyzstan: what does the evidence tell us? World Health Organization; 2018. 69 p. (In Russ). Доступно по: https://www.euro.who.int/ru/health-topics/Health-systems/primary-health-care/publications/2018/a-scoping-review-on-health-services-delivery-in-kyrgyzstan-what-does-the-evidence-tell-us-2018. Ссылка активна на 10.05.2021.Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Blackmore H, Kitas GD. Writing a narrative biomedical review: Considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors. Rheumatol Int. 2011;31(11):1409–1417. doi: 10.1007/s00296-011-1999-3Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Blackmore H, Kitas GD. Writing a narrative biomedical review: Considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors. Rheumatol Int. 2011;31(11):1409–1417. doi: 10.1007/s00296-011-1999-3Baethge C, Goldbeck-Wood S, Mertens S. SANRA — a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019;4(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8Baethge C, Goldbeck-Wood S, Mertens S. SANRA — a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019;4(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8Davis K, Drey N, Gould D. What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46(10):1386–1400. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.02.010Davis K, Drey N, Gould D. What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46(10):1386–1400. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.02.010Armstrong R, Hall BJ, Doyle J, Waters E. “Scoping the scope” of a cochrane review. J Public Health (Bangkok). 2011;33(1):147–150. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr015Armstrong R, Hall BJ, Doyle J, Waters E. “Scoping the scope” of a cochrane review. J Public Health (Bangkok). 2011;33(1):147–150. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr015Daudt HML, Van Mossel C, Scott SJ. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: A large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-48Daudt HML, Van Mossel C, Scott SJ. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: A large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-48Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O’Brien KK, et al. Scoping reviews: Time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(12):1291–1294. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O’Brien KK, et al. Scoping reviews: Time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(12):1291–1294. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013Pham MT, Rajić A, Greig JD, et al. A scoping review of scoping reviews: Advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods. 2014;5(4):371–385. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1123Pham MT, Rajić A, Greig JD, et al. A scoping review of scoping reviews: Advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods. 2014;5(4):371–385. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1123Peters MDJ, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, et al. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):141–146. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050Peters MDJ, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, et al. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):141–146. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, et al. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):143. doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0611-xMunn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, et al. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):143. doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0611-xFulop N, Allen P, Clarke A, Black N. Studying the Organisation and Delivery of Health Services: Research Methods. Routledge; 2001.Fulop N, Allen P, Clarke A, Black N. Studying the Organisation and Delivery of Health Services: Research Methods. Routledge; 2001.O’Malley L, Croucher K. Supported housing services for people with mental health problems: A scoping study. Hous Stud. 2005;20(5):831–845. doi: 10.1080/02673030500214126O’Malley L, Croucher K. Supported housing services for people with mental health problems: A scoping study. Hous Stud. 2005;20(5):831–845. doi: 10.1080/02673030500214126Arksey H, O’Malley L, Baldwin S, et al. Services to Support Carers of People with Mental Health Problems. Natl Coord Cent Serv Deliv Organ. 2002. Available online: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/73297/1/Document.pdf. Accessed on May 10, 2021.Arksey H, O’Malley L, Baldwin S, et al. Services to Support Carers of People with Mental Health Problems. Natl Coord Cent Serv Deliv Organ. 2002. Available online: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/73297/1/Document.pdf. Accessed on May 10, 2021.Ehrich K, Freeman GK, Richards SC, et al. How to do a scoping exercise: continuity of care. Res Policy Plan. 2002;20(1):25–29.Ehrich K, Freeman GK, Richards SC, et al. How to do a scoping exercise: continuity of care. Res Policy Plan. 2002;20(1):25–29.Freeman G, Shepperd S, Robinson I, Ehrich K. Continuity of Care. Report of a Scoping Exercise for the National Co-Ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R&D (NCCSDO). London: NCCSDO; 2001.Freeman G, Shepperd S, Robinson I, Ehrich K. Continuity of Care. Report of a Scoping Exercise for the National Co-Ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R&D (NCCSDO). London: NCCSDO; 2001.Anderson S, Allen P, Peckham S, Goodwin N. Asking the right questions: Scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services. Heal Res Policy Syst. 2008;6(1):1–12. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-6-7Anderson S, Allen P, Peckham S, Goodwin N. Asking the right questions: Scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services. Heal Res Policy Syst. 2008;6(1):1–12. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-6-7Brien SE, Lorenzetti DL, Lewis S, et al. Overview of a formal scoping review on health system report cards. Implement Sci. 2010;5:2. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-2Brien SE, Lorenzetti DL, Lewis S, et al. Overview of a formal scoping review on health system report cards. Implement Sci. 2010;5:2. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-2Cacchione PZ. The Evolving Methodology of Scoping Reviews. Clin Nurs Res. 2016;25(2):115–119. doi: 10.1177/1054773816637493Cacchione PZ. The Evolving Methodology of Scoping Reviews. Clin Nurs Res. 2016;25(2):115–119. doi: 10.1177/1054773816637493Khalil H, Peters M, Godfrey CM, et al. An Evidence-Based Approach to Scoping Reviews. Worldviews Evidence-Based Nurs. 2016;13(2):118–123. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12144Khalil H, Peters M, Godfrey CM, et al. An Evidence-Based Approach to Scoping Reviews. Worldviews Evidence-Based Nurs. 2016;13(2):118–123. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12144Peters MDJ. In no uncertain terms: The importance of a defined objective in scoping reviews. JBI Database Syst Rev Implement Reports. 2016;14(2):1–4. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2838Peters MDJ. In no uncertain terms: The importance of a defined objective in scoping reviews. JBI Database Syst Rev Implement Reports. 2016;14(2):1–4. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2838Peters MDJ. Managing and Coding References for Systematic Reviews and Scoping Reviews in EndNote. Med Ref Serv Q. 2017; 36(1):19–31. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2017.1259891Peters MDJ. Managing and Coding References for Systematic Reviews and Scoping Reviews in EndNote. Med Ref Serv Q. 2017; 36(1):19–31. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2017.1259891O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. Advancing scoping study methodology: A web-based survey and consultation of perceptions on terminology, definition and methodological steps. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1579-zO’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. Advancing scoping study methodology: A web-based survey and consultation of perceptions on terminology, definition and methodological steps. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1579-zMorris M, Boruff JT, Gore GC. Scoping reviews: Establishing the role of the librarian. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016;104(4):346–353. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.104.4.020Morris M, Boruff JT, Gore GC. Scoping reviews: Establishing the role of the librarian. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016;104(4):346–353. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.104.4.020Martin GP, Jenkins DA, Bull L, et al. Toward a framework for the design, implementation, and reporting of methodology scoping reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;127:191–197. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.014Martin GP, Jenkins DA, Bull L, et al. Toward a framework for the design, implementation, and reporting of methodology scoping reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;127:191–197. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.014Schultz A, Goertzen L, Rothney J, et al. A scoping approach to systematically review published reviews: Adaptations and recom mendations. Res Synth Methods. 2018;9(1):116–123. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1272Schultz A, Goertzen L, Rothney J, et al. A scoping approach to systematically review published reviews: Adaptations and recom mendations. Res Synth Methods. 2018;9(1):116–123. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1272Thomas A, Lubarsky S, Varpio L, et al. Scoping reviews in health professions education: challenges, considerations and lessons learned about epistemology and methodology. Adv Heal Sci Educ. 2020;25(4):989–1002. doi: 10.1007/s10459-019-09932-2Thomas A, Lubarsky S, Varpio L, et al. Scoping reviews in health professions education: challenges, considerations and lessons learned about epistemology and methodology. Adv Heal Sci Educ. 2020;25(4):989–1002. doi: 10.1007/s10459-019-09932-2Thomas A, Lubarsky S, Durning SJ, Young ME. Knowledge syntheses in medical education: Demystifying scoping reviews. Acad Med. 2017;92(2):161–166. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001452Thomas A, Lubarsky S, Durning SJ, Young ME. Knowledge syntheses in medical education: Demystifying scoping reviews. Acad Med. 2017;92(2):161–166. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001452Harris SP, Gould R, Fujiura G. Enhancing rigor and practice of scoping reviews in social policy research: Considerations from a worked example on the Americans with Disabilities Act. Work. 2015;50(2):323–334. doi: 10.3233/WOR-141982Harris SP, Gould R, Fujiura G. Enhancing rigor and practice of scoping reviews in social policy research: Considerations from a worked example on the Americans with Disabilities Act. Work. 2015;50(2):323–334. doi: 10.3233/WOR-141982Rumrill PD, Fitzgerald SM, Merchant WR. Using scoping literature reviews as a means of understanding and interpreting existing literature. Work. 2010;35(3):399–404. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2010-0998Rumrill PD, Fitzgerald SM, Merchant WR. Using scoping literature reviews as a means of understanding and interpreting existing literature. Work. 2010;35(3):399–404. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2010-0998Hidalgo Landa A, Szabo I, Le Brun L, et al. An Evidence-Based Approach to Scoping Reviews. Electron J Inf Syst Eval. 2011; 14(1):46–52.Hidalgo Landa A, Szabo I, Le Brun L, et al. An Evidence-Based Approach to Scoping Reviews. Electron J Inf Syst Eval. 2011; 14(1):46–52.Lockwood C, dos Santos KB, Pap R. Practical Guidance for Knowledge Synthesis: Scoping Review Methods. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2019;13(5):287–294. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2019.11.002Lockwood C, dos Santos KB, Pap R. Practical Guidance for Knowledge Synthesis: Scoping Review Methods. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2019;13(5):287–294. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2019.11.002Lockwood C, Tricco AC. Preparing scoping reviews for publication using methodological guides and reporting standards. Nurs Heal Sci. 2020;22(1):1–4. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12673Lockwood C, Tricco AC. Preparing scoping reviews for publication using methodological guides and reporting standards. Nurs Heal Sci. 2020;22(1):1–4. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12673Pollock D, Davies EL, Peters MDJ, et al. Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics. J Adv Nurs. 2021;77(4): 2102–2113. doi: 10.1111/jan.14743Pollock D, Davies EL, Peters MDJ, et al. Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics. J Adv Nurs. 2021;77(4): 2102–2113. doi: 10.1111/jan.14743Sucharew H, Macaluso M. Methods for research evidence synthesis: The scoping review approach. J Hosp Med. 2019;14(7): 416–418. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3248Sucharew H, Macaluso M. Methods for research evidence synthesis: The scoping review approach. J Hosp Med. 2019;14(7): 416–418. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3248Fitzgerald SM, Rumrill PD, Merchant WR. A response to Harris, Gould, and Fujiura: Beyond scoping reviews: A case for mixed-methods research reviews. Work. 2015;50(2):335–339. doi: 10.3233/WOR-141983Fitzgerald SM, Rumrill PD, Merchant WR. A response to Harris, Gould, and Fujiura: Beyond scoping reviews: A case for mixed-methods research reviews. Work. 2015;50(2):335–339. doi: 10.3233/WOR-141983Peterson J, Pearce PF, Ferguson LA, Langford CA. Understanding scoping reviews: Definition, purpose, and process. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2017;29(1):12–16. doi: 10.1002/2327-6924.12380Peterson J, Pearce PF, Ferguson LA, Langford CA. Understanding scoping reviews: Definition, purpose, and process. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2017;29(1):12–16. doi: 10.1002/2327-6924.12380Anderson JK, Howarth E, Vainre M, et al. Advancing methodology for scoping reviews: Recommendations arising from a scoping literature review (SLR) to inform transformation of Children and Adolescent Mental Health Services. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020; 20(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01127-3Anderson JK, Howarth E, Vainre M, et al. Advancing methodology for scoping reviews: Recommendations arising from a scoping literature review (SLR) to inform transformation of Children and Adolescent Mental Health Services. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020; 20(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01127-3Bakaki PM, Staley J, Liu R, et al. A transdisciplinary team approach to scoping reviews: The case of pediatric polypharmacy. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0560-4Bakaki PM, Staley J, Liu R, et al. A transdisciplinary team approach to scoping reviews: The case of pediatric polypharmacy. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0560-4Dalmer NK. Unsettling Knowledge Synthesis Methods Using Institutional Ethnography: Reflections on the Scoping Review as a Critical Knowledge Synthesis Tool. Qual Health Res. 2020; 30(14):2361–2373. doi: 10.1177/1049732320949167Dalmer NK. Unsettling Knowledge Synthesis Methods Using Institutional Ethnography: Reflections on the Scoping Review as a Critical Knowledge Synthesis Tool. Qual Health Res. 2020; 30(14):2361–2373. doi: 10.1177/1049732320949167Cooper S, Cant R, Kelly M, et al. An Evidence-Based Checklist for Improving Scoping Review Quality. Clin Nurs Res. 2021;30(3): 230–240. doi: 10.1177/1054773819846024Cooper S, Cant R, Kelly M, et al. An Evidence-Based Checklist for Improving Scoping Review Quality. Clin Nurs Res. 2021;30(3): 230–240. doi: 10.1177/1054773819846024Khalil H, Bennett M, Godfrey C, et al. Evaluation of the JBI scoping reviews methodology by current users. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2019;18(1):95–100. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000202Khalil H, Bennett M, Godfrey C, et al. Evaluation of the JBI scoping reviews methodology by current users. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2019;18(1):95–100. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000202Khalil H, Peters MD, Tricco AC, et al. Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021; 130:156–160. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.009Khalil H, Peters MD, Tricco AC, et al. Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021; 130:156–160. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.009PRISMA Translations Policy. Available online: http://www.prisma-statement.org/Translations/TranslationsPolicy. Accessed on May 10, 2021.PRISMA Translations Policy. Available online: http://www.prisma-statement.org/Translations/TranslationsPolicy. Accessed on May 10, 2021.PRISMA 2009 Контрольный лист. [PRISMA 2009 Checklist. (In Russ). Available online: http://www.prisma-statement.org/documents/PRISMARussianchecklist.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2021.PRISMA 2009 Контрольный лист. [PRISMA 2009 Checklist. (In Russ). Available online: http://www.prisma-statement.org/documents/PRISMARussianchecklist.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2021.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.