Differential Diagnosis of Hurler and Hurler–Scheie Syndromes: Clinical Case
https://doi.org/10.15690/vsp.v24i2.2883
Abstract
Background. Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I) is a disease known for over 100 years. Implementation of new management approaches for MPS I requires from doctor to clearly differentiate subtypes of this disease for the effective and rational use of treatment methods. Clinical case description. Girl B. with early MPS I onset during the neonatal period. Symptoms of musculoskeletal system damage were the following: feet adduction and hip joints dysplasia. Further follow-up at the age of 6 months has shown linear growth retardation, umbilical hernia, and exudative otitis. Psychomotor development up to 1 year of age was delayed. Coarse facial features by the age 1.5 years along with orthopedic problems, exudative otitis, and umbilical hernia led to mucopolysaccharidosis diagnosis. The diagnosis of mucopolysaccharidosis type I was established according to clinical findings, enzyme diagnostics (significant decrease in lysosomal enzyme alpha-L-iduronidase activity — 0.26 μmol/l/h; reference values from 1.96), and molecular genetic testing (pathogenic variant c.208C>T (Gln70Ter) in exon 2 and nucleotide variant of unknown clinical value c.1524G>C (p.Glu508Asp) in exon 10 of IDUA gene in compound heterozygous state). Echocardiography has revealed structural changes in the mitral valve and minimal aortic insufficiency. Abdominal ultrasound has revealed signs of hepatomegaly, hydrocalycosis, right-side pyelectasia, kidneys’ sizes lesser than the age norms. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging has shown simple kidney cysts. Conclusion. The major feature of this clinical case is the complexity of differential diagnosis between the severe form of MPS I, Hurler syndrome, and milder form, Hurler–Scheie syndrome. Molecular genetic testing has revealed the presence of the frequent pathogenic variant c.208C>T (Gln70Ter) in the IDUA gene associated with severe disease course and nucleotide variant c.1524G>C (p.Glu508Asp) with undefined clinical significance, thus, additional examination is necessary. Functional analysis of the novel variant is required to establish its role in protein function. It will help more precisely determine the disease form and predict its severity. Combination of MPS I and polycystic kidney disease in the proband is unique case.
Keywords
About the Authors
Nataliya V. BuchinskayaRussian Federation
Saint-Petersburg
Disclosure of interest:
Nataliya V. Buchinskaya — receiving fees for giving papers (at scientific events, lecturing for doctors) from Sanofi
Anastasiya O. Vechkasova
Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg
Disclosure of interest:
Authors confirmed the absence of a reportable conflict of interests
Ekaterina E. Shishunova
Russian Federation
Voronezh
Disclosure of interest:
Authors confirmed the absence of a reportable conflict of interests
Yuliya S. Kravtsova
Russian Federation
Voronezh
Disclosure of interest:
Authors confirmed the absence of a reportable conflict of interests
Nato D. Vashakmadze
Russian Federation
Moscow
Disclosure of interest:
Nato D. Vashakmadze — lecturing for pharmaceutical companies Takeda, Sanofi, Biomarin, Nanolek, Chiesi pharmaceuticals, Nutricia, AstraZeneca
Nataliya V. Zhurkova
Russian Federation
Moscow
Disclosure of interest:
Nataliya V. Zhurkova — lecturing for pharmaceutical companies Takeda, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Chiesi pharmaceuticals, Nutricia
Mikhail M. Kostik
Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg
Disclosure of interest:
Mikhail M. Kostik — receiving fees for giving papers (at scientific events, lecturing for doctors) from Sanofi
References
1. Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I: Search results in PubMed Central (PMC). Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/?term=Mucopolysaccharidosis+Type+I. Accessed on February, 04, 2025.
2. Clarke LA, Giugliani R, Guffon N, et al. Genotype-phenotype relationships in mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I): Insights from the International MPS I Registry. Clin Genet. 2019;96(4):281–289. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.13583
3. D’Aco K, Underhill L, Rangachari L, et al. Diagnosis and treatment trends in mucopolysaccharidosis I: findings from the MPS I Registry. Eur J Pediatr. 2012;171(6):911–919. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-011-1644-x
4. Hampe CS, Eisengart JB, Lund TC, et al. Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I: A Review of the Natural History and Molecular Pathology. Cells. 2020;9(8):1838. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9081838
5. Gentner B, Tucci F, Galimberti S, et al. Hematopoietic Stemand Progenitor-Cell Gene Therapy for Hurler Syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(21):1929–1940. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2106596
6. Hurt SC, Dickson PI, Curiel DT. Mucopolysaccharidoses type I gene therapy. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2021;44(5):1088–1098. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jimd.12414
7. Harmatz P, Giugliani R, Martins AM, et al. α-L-iduronidase fused with humanized anti-human transferrin receptor antibody (lepunafusp alfa) for mucopolysaccharidosis type I: A phase 1/2 trial. Mol Ther. 2024;32(3):609–618. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2024.01.009
8. Sato Y, Minami K, Hirato T, et al. Drug delivery for neuronopathic lysosomal storage diseases: evolving roles of the blood brain barrier and cerebrospinal fluid. Metab Brain Dis. 2022;37(6):1745–1756. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11011-021-00893-3
9. Mucopolysaccharidosis I (MPS I) Registry. In: ClinicalTrials.gov. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00144794. Accessed on April 07, 2025.
10. Hampe CS, Wesley J, Lund TC, et al. Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I: Current Treatments, Limitations, and Prospects for Improvement. Biomolecules. 2021;11(2):189. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11020189
11. de Ru MH, Boelens JJ, Das AM, et al. Enzyme replacement therapy and/or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at diagnosis in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type I: results of a European consensus procedure. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011;6:55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-6-55
Review
For citations:
Buchinskaya N.V., Vechkasova A.O., Shishunova E.E., Kravtsova Yu.S., Vashakmadze N.D., Zhurkova N.V., Kostik M.M. Differential Diagnosis of Hurler and Hurler–Scheie Syndromes: Clinical Case. Current Pediatrics. 2025;24(2):105-111. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15690/vsp.v24i2.2883