Differential Diagnosis of Mild Form of Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I (Scheie Syndrome) and Juvenile Systemic Scleroderma (Case Study)
https://doi.org/10.15690/vsp.v25i2.3035
Abstract
Background. Mild forms of mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I), Hurler – Scheie and Scheie syndromes, are characterized by late onset and non-specific symptoms. Particularly, the clinically dominant joint may lead to misdiagnosis of rheumatic disease. Case description. Girl S., at the age of 4 years 8 months, has shown limitation in hands' joints movements. Later at the age of 5 years and 1 month symmetrical polyarthritis with damage of large and small joints of upper and lower limbs with contractures was revealed; antinuclear factor was 1 : 160; and juvenile idiopathic arthritis was diagnosed. Then at the age of 5 years 2 months diagnosis has changed to limited form of juvenile systemic scleroderma due to additional symptoms onset: induration and elasticity decrease of hands, forearms, feet and lower legs skin, restriction of mouth opening, gastrointestinal tract lesions (cardia insufficiency, gastroesophageal reflux). Management with antirheumatic therapy (methylprednisolone, methotrexate) resulted in decreased skin density and increased amplitude of joints movements. Clinical features and disease course forced us to continue the diagnostic search. Enzyme diagnostics was performed: decrease in alpha-iduronidase activity to 0.06 μmol/L (normal range 1.00–25.00 μmol/L) was revealed. Quantitative analysis of glycosaminoglycans (GAG) in urine was performed: total GAG level was 20.0 mg/mmol creatinine (age limit 0.8–24.9 mg/mmol creatinine). One-dimensional GAG electrophoresis has revealed increased heparan sulfate and dermatan sulfate urinary excretion. Direct automatic sequencing of exons 2 and 7 of the IDUA gene revealed pathogenic variant c.208C>T (pGin70Term), from the father, and change in the nucleotide sequence c.878_889dup leading to the replacement of p.Thr293_Tyr2, from mother, in compound heterozygous state. The diagnosis of “MPS I, Sheie syndrome” was established.
Conclusion. Pediatricians and pediatric rheumatologists should include molecular genetic methods in the examination protocols for the timely detection of hereditary diseases, particularly mild forms of MPS I, when conducting differential diagnosis in patients with specific articular changes.
Keywords
About the Authors
Nadezhda S. PodchernyaevaRussian Federation
Moscow
Disclosure of interest:
Nadezhda S. Podchernyaeva — receiving fees as a speaker (at scientific events, lecturing doctors) from Sanofi.
Nato D. Vashakmadze — lecturing for pharmaceutical companies Takeda, Sanofi, Biomarin, Nanolek, Kyezi, Nutricia, Astrazeneka.
Elena S. Zholobova — receiving fees as a speaker (at scientific events, lecturing doctors) from Sanofi.
Other authors confirmed the absence of a reportable conflict of interest.
Tatyana V. Zubareva
Russian Federation
Moscow
Disclosure of interest:
Nadezhda S. Podchernyaeva — receiving fees as a speaker (at scientific events, lecturing doctors) from Sanofi.
Nato D. Vashakmadze — lecturing for pharmaceutical companies Takeda, Sanofi, Biomarin, Nanolek, Kyezi, Nutricia, Astrazeneka.
Elena S. Zholobova — receiving fees as a speaker (at scientific events, lecturing doctors) from Sanofi.
Other authors confirmed the absence of a reportable conflict of interest.
Nato D. Vashakmadze
Russian Federation
Moscow
Disclosure of interest:
Nadezhda S. Podchernyaeva — receiving fees as a speaker (at scientific events, lecturing doctors) from Sanofi.
Nato D. Vashakmadze — lecturing for pharmaceutical companies Takeda, Sanofi, Biomarin, Nanolek, Kyezi, Nutricia, Astrazeneka.
Elena S. Zholobova — receiving fees as a speaker (at scientific events, lecturing doctors) from Sanofi.
Other authors confirmed the absence of a reportable conflict of interest.
Mariya K. Osminina
Russian Federation
Moscow
Disclosure of interest:
Nadezhda S. Podchernyaeva — receiving fees as a speaker (at scientific events, lecturing doctors) from Sanofi.
Nato D. Vashakmadze — lecturing for pharmaceutical companies Takeda, Sanofi, Biomarin, Nanolek, Kyezi, Nutricia, Astrazeneka.
Elena S. Zholobova — receiving fees as a speaker (at scientific events, lecturing doctors) from Sanofi.
Other authors confirmed the absence of a reportable conflict of interest.
Oksana V. Batyreva
Russian Federation
Moscow
Disclosure of interest:
Nadezhda S. Podchernyaeva — receiving fees as a speaker (at scientific events, lecturing doctors) from Sanofi.
Nato D. Vashakmadze — lecturing for pharmaceutical companies Takeda, Sanofi, Biomarin, Nanolek, Kyezi, Nutricia, Astrazeneka.
Elena S. Zholobova — receiving fees as a speaker (at scientific events, lecturing doctors) from Sanofi.
Other authors confirmed the absence of a reportable conflict of interest.
Angela K. Karamurzina
Russian Federation
Moscow
Disclosure of interest:
Nadezhda S. Podchernyaeva — receiving fees as a speaker (at scientific events, lecturing doctors) from Sanofi.
Nato D. Vashakmadze — lecturing for pharmaceutical companies Takeda, Sanofi, Biomarin, Nanolek, Kyezi, Nutricia, Astrazeneka.
Elena S. Zholobova — receiving fees as a speaker (at scientific events, lecturing doctors) from Sanofi.
Other authors confirmed the absence of a reportable conflict of interest.
Elena S. Zholobova
Russian Federation
Moscow
Disclosure of interest:
Nadezhda S. Podchernyaeva — receiving fees as a speaker (at scientific events, lecturing doctors) from Sanofi.
Nato D. Vashakmadze — lecturing for pharmaceutical companies Takeda, Sanofi, Biomarin, Nanolek, Kyezi, Nutricia, Astrazeneka.
Elena S. Zholobova — receiving fees as a speaker (at scientific events, lecturing doctors) from Sanofi.
Other authors confirmed the absence of a reportable conflict of interest.
References
1. Mukopolisakharidoz tip I: Clinical guidelines. Union of Pediatricians of Russia; Association of Medical Genetics. Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; 2025. 79 p. (In Russ).]
2. Campos D, Monaga M. Mucopolysaccharidosis type I: Current knowledge on its pathophysiological mechanisms. Metab Brain Dis. 2012;27(2):121–129. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11011-0129302-1
3. Parini R, Deodato F, Di Rocco M, et al. Open issues in Mucopolysaccharidosis type I-Hurler. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017;12(1):112. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-0170662-9
4. Khan SA, Peracha H, Ballhausen D, et al. Epidemiology of mucopolysaccharidoses. Mol Genet Metab. 2017;121(3):227–240. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgme.2017.05.016
5. Moore D, Connock MJ, Wraith E, et al. The prevalence of and survival in mucopolysaccharidosis I: Hurler, Hurler-Scheie and Scheie syndromes in the UK. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2008;3:24–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-3-24
6. Federhen A, Pasqualim G, de Freitas TF, et al. Estimated birth prevalence of mucopolysaccharidoses in Brazil. Am J Med Genet A. 2020;182(3):469–483. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.61456
7. Muenzer J, Wraith JE, Clarke LA, et al. Mucopolysaccharidosis I: management and treatment guidelines. Pediatrics. 2009;123(1): 19–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-0416
8. Beck M, Arn P, Giugliani R, et al. The natural history of MPS I: Global perspectives from the MPS I Registry. Genet Med. 2014;16(10): 759–765. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2014.25
9. Hanson M, Lupski JR, Hicks J, Metry D. Association of dermal melanocytosis with lysosomal storage disease: Clinical features and hypotheses regarding pathogenesis. Arch Dermatol. 2003;139(7):916–920. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.139.7.916
10. Kennedy J, Noel J, O’Meara A, Kelly P. Foot and ankle abnormalities in the hurler syndrome: Additions to the phenotype. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33(5):558–562. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0b013e318280a124
11. Różdżyńska-Świątkowska A, Jurecka A, Żuber Z, TylkiSzymańska A. Can macrosomia or large for gestational age be predictive of mucopolysaccharidosis type I, II and VI? Pediatr Neonatol. 2016;57(3):181–187. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedneo.2015.04.015
12. Shapiro EG, Nestrasil I, Rudser K, et al. Neurocognition across the spectrum of mucopolysaccharidosis type I: Age, severity, and treatment. Mol Genet Metab. 2015;116(1-2):61–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgme.2015.06.002
13. Nicolas-Jilwan M, AlSayed M. Mucopolysaccharidoses: overview of neuroimaging manifestations. Pediatr Radiol. 2018;48(10): 1503–1520. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4139-3
14. McGovern E, Owens L, Nunn J, et al. Oral features and dental health in Hurler Syndrome following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2010;20(5):322–329. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2010.01055.x
15. Kubaski F, de Oliveira Poswar F, Michelin-Tirelli K, et al. Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020;10(3):161. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10030161
16. Rasalkar DD, Chu WCW, Hui J, et al. Pictorial review of mucopolysaccharidosis with emphasis on MRI features of brain and spine. Br J Radiol. 2011;84(1001):469–477. doi: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/59197814
17. Leighton SE, Papsin B, Vellodi A, et al. Disordered breathing during sleep in patients with mucopolysaccharidoses. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2001;58(2):127–138. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-5876(01)00417-7
18. Lin HY, Shih SC, Chuang CK, et al. Assessment of hearing loss by pure-tone audiometry in patients with mucopolysaccharidoses. Mol Genet Metab. 2014;111(4):533–538. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgme.2014.02.003
19. Braunlin EA, Harmatz PR, Scarpa M, et al. Cardiac disease in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis: Presentation, diagnosis and management. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2011;34(6):1183–1197. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10545-011-9359-8
20. Braunlin E, Wang R. Cardiac issues in adults with the mucopolysaccharidoses: Current knowledge and emerging needs. Heart. 2016;102(16):1257–1262. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2015-309258
21. De Poswar FO, De Souza CFM, Giugliani R, Baldo G. Aortic root dilatation in patients with mucopolysaccharidoses and the impact of enzyme replacement therapy. Heart Vessel. 2019;34(2):290–295. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-018-1242-1
22. Ashworth JL, Biswas S, Wraith E, Lloyd IC. The ocular features of the mucopolysaccharidoses. Eye (Lond). 2006;20(5):553–563. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6701921
23. Clarke LA, Giugliani R, Guffon N, et al. Genotype-phenotype relationships in mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I): Insights from the International MPS I Registry. Clin Genet. 2019;96(4):281–289. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.13583
24. Baidakova GV, Baranov AA, Vakhlova IV, et al. Modern Approaches to the Management of Children with Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I. Pediatricheskaya farmakologiya — Pediatric pharmacology. 2022;19(4):342–353. (In Russ). doi: https://doi.org/10.15690/pf.v19i4.2443]
25. Spravochnik po vyyavleniyu patsientov s redkimi orfannymi boleznyami v khode provedeniya profilakticheskikh osmotrov. Baranov AA, Namazova-Baranova LS, Vashakmadze ND, eds. 2nd edn, rev. and add. Moscow: Pediatr; 2025. 428 p. (In Russ).]
26. Poletto E, Pasqualim G, Giugliani R, et al. Worldwide distribution of common IDUA pathogenic variants. Clin Genet. 2018;94(1):95–102. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.13224
27. Diogo R, Diogo L, Serra R, et al. Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I: The Importance of Early Diagnosis for Adequate Treatment. Cureus. 2023;15(12):e50595. doi: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.50595
28. Zulian F, Woo P, Athreya BH, et al. The Pediatric Rheumatology European Society/American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism provisional classification criteria for juvenile systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57(2):203–212. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.22551
29. Bruni S, Lavery C, Broomfield A. The diagnostic journey of patients with mucopolysaccharidosis I: a real-world survey of patient and physician experiences. Mol Genet Metab Rep. 2016;8:67–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgmr.2016.07.006
30. Cimaz R, Coppa GV, Koné-Paut I, et al. Joint contractures in the absence of inflammation may indicate mucopolysaccharidosis. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2009;7:18–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1546-0096-7-18
31. Vashakmadze ND, Kostik MM, Zhurkova NV, et al. Articular Syndrome Characteristics in Children with Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I. Voprosy sovremennoi pediatrii — Current Pediatrics. 2021;20(6s):567–575. (In Russ). doi.org/10.15690/vsp.v20i6S.2364Е]
32. Hampe CS, Eisengart JB, Lund TC, et al. Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I: A Review of the Natural History and Molecular Pathology. Cells. 2020;9(8):1838. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9081838
33. Simonaro CM, D’Angelo M, He X, et al. Mechanism of glycosaminoglycan-mediated bone and joint disease: Implications for the mucopolysaccharidoses and other connective tissue diseases. Am J Pathol. 2008;172(1):112–122. doi: https://doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2008.070564
34. Polgreen LE, Kunin-Batson A, Rudser K, et al. Pilot study of the safety and effect of adalimumab on pain, physical function, and musculoskeletal disease in mucopolysaccharidosis types I and II. Mol Genet Metab Rep. 2017;10:75–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgmr.2017.01.002
35. Rukovodstvo po detskoi revmatologii. Geppe NA, Podchernyaev NS, Lyskina GA, eds. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2011. 720 p. (In Russ).]
36. Osminina MK, Podchernyaeva NS, Khachatryan LG, et al. Clinical and immunological manifestations of systemic scleroderma in children according to data from a rheumatology center. Voprosy prakticheskoi pediatrii = Clinical Practice in Pediatrics. 2025;20(3):89–97. (In Russ). doi: https://doi.org/10.20953/1817-7646-2025-89-97]
Review
For citations:
Podchernyaeva N.S., Zubareva T.V., Vashakmadze N.D., Osminina M.K., Batyreva O.V., Karamurzina A.K., Zholobova E.S. Differential Diagnosis of Mild Form of Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I (Scheie Syndrome) and Juvenile Systemic Scleroderma (Case Study). Current Pediatrics. 2026;25(2):67–77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15690/vsp.v25i2.3035
JATS XML
































