SELF-PLAGIARISM IN MANUSCRIPTS SUBMITTED TO A SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL: RECOMMENDATIONS ON FORMULATION OF THE EDITORIAL POLICY
https://doi.org/10.15690/vsp.v16i4.1772
Abstract
Self-plagiarism is one of the most controversial issues faced by participants in the publication process (authors, editors, reviewers). The article presents a brief analysis on the professional editorial communities' position on the problem. We give both comments and recommendations on formulation of the academic journal editorial policy. The paper provides the examples when the self-plagiarism is acceptable (minor copying of a few sentences, source fully and clearly referenced). In addition, it is pointed out that self-plagiarism can bear reputational and legal risks to an academic journal. Authors should consider this aspect when interacting with editors and reviewers.
About the Author
Ruslan Т. SaygitovRussian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Методические рекомендации по подготовке и оформлению научных статей в журналах, индексируемых в международных наукометрических базах данных. [Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po podgotovke i oformleniyu nauchnykh statei v zhurnalakh, indeksiruemykh v mezhdunarodnykh naukometricheskikh bazakh dannykh. (In Russ).] Доступно по: https://www.asu.ru/files/documents/00017094.pdf. Ссылка активна на 26.05.2017.
2. publicationethics.org [Internet]. COPE flowchart for suspected redundant publication in a submitted manuscript [cited 2017 May 26]. Available from: https://publicationethics.org/files/redundant%20publication%20A_0.pdf.
3. publicationethics.org [Internet]. Plagiarism or redundant publication? [cited 2017 May 26]. Available from: https://publicationethics.org/case/plagiarism-or-redundant-publication.
4. Moskovitz C. Text recycling in health sciences research literature: a rhetorical perspective. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2017;2(1). doi: 10.1186/s41073-017-0025-z.
5. publicationethics.org [Internet]. Text Recycling Guidelines [cited 2017 May 26]. Available from: https://publicationethics.org/textrecycling-guidelines.
6. publicationethic.wordpress.com [Internet]. Research Misconduct #2 (duplicate impact myth) [cited 2017 May 26]. Available from: https://publicationethic.wordpress.com/2016/11/10/researchmisconduct-2-duplicate-impact-myth/.
Review
For citations:
Saygitov R.Т. SELF-PLAGIARISM IN MANUSCRIPTS SUBMITTED TO A SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL: RECOMMENDATIONS ON FORMULATION OF THE EDITORIAL POLICY. Current Pediatrics. 2017;16(4):270-272. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15690/vsp.v16i4.1772