PROJECT OF THE STUDY OF HEALTH MODELS AND FACTORS INFLUENCING A SANOGENIC BEHAVIOUR OF THE POPULATION IN RESPECT OF THE ASPECT OF THE VACCINE PREVENTION
https://doi.org/10.15690/vsp.v14i1.1273
Abstract
The problem of preventing the distribution of infectious diseases, due to the need to find new, more effective strategies of counteraction to the antivaccine lobby, is considered. The necessity of complex studies on the testing of main hypothetical theses of such strategy is grounded. The main blocks of the corresponding research project are considered. The conclusion about the need to identify interrelations between certain types of biological and social epidemics is drawn, influencing on which, it is possible to achieve impressive results in the effective prevention of these socially dangerous phenomena.
About the Authors
A. L. Katkov
International Institute of Social Psychotherapy, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M. A. Kramm
Rostropovich–Vishnevskaya Foundation «For the Health and Future of Children», Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ye. Ya. Frolova
Rostropovich–Vishnevskaya Foundation «For the Health and Future of Children», Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Mergler M.J., Omer S.B., Pan W.K.Y., Novar-Bogan AM, Orenstein W. et al. Association of vaccine-related attitudes and beliefs between parents and health care providers. Vaccine. 2013; 31: 4591–4595.
2. Zimmerman R.K., Wolfe R.M., Fox D.E, Fox J.R., Nowalk M.P., Troy J.A., Sharp L.K. Vaccine criticism on the World Wide Web. J. Med. Internet Res. 2005; 7 (2): 17.
3. Kata A. A postmodern Pandora’s box: anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet. Vaccine. 2010; 28 (7): 1709–1716.
4. Wolfe R., Sharp L. Anti-vaccinationists past and present. BMJ. 2002; 325: 430–432.
5. Kata A. Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm — an overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement. Vaccine. 2012; 30 (25): 3778–3789.
6. Wolfe R.M., Sharp L.K., Lipsky M.S. Content and design attributes of antivaccination web sites. JAMA. 2002; 287 (24): 3245–3248.
7. Kotok A. Besposhchadnaya immunizatsiya. Pravdao privivkakh [Ruthless Immunization. Truth about Vaccinations]. 2nd ed., rev. and corr. Novosibirsk, Gomeopaticheskaya kniga, 2010. 592 p.
8. Miller N. Privivki: deystvitel'no li oni bezopasny i effektivny? [Vaccines: Are They Really Safe and Effective?] Transl. from Engl. Мoscow, BINOM. Laboratoriya znaniy, 2011. 144 p.
9. Mats A.N. Vracham ob antiprivivochnom dvizhenii i ego vymyslakh v SMI [To Doctors on the Anti-Vaccination Movement and Its Fictions in the Media]. Pediatricheskaya farmakologiya = Pediatric pharmacology. 2009; 6 (6): 12–35.
10. Bonhoeffer J., Heininger U. Adverse events following immunization: perception and evidence. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2007; 20 (3): 237–246. DOI:10.1097/QCO.0b013e32811ebfb0. PMID 17471032.
11. Stephen D. Sugarman G. Cases in Vaccine Court — Legal Battles over Vaccines and Autism. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007; 357: 1275–1277.
12. Katkov A.L. Destruktivnye sotsial'nye epidemii: opyt sistemnogo issledovaniya [Destructive Social Epidemics: Experience of System Research]. Pavlodar, 2012. 223 p.
13. Jacobson R.M., Targonski P.V., Poland G.A. A taxonomy of reasoning flaws in the anti-vaccine movement. Vaccine. 2007; 25 (16): 3146–3152.
14. Healey C., Pickering L. How to Communicate With Vaccine-Hesitant Parents. Pediatrics. 2011; 127: 127–133.
15. Larson H.J., Cooper L.Z, Eskola J., Katz S.L, Ratzan S. Addressing the vaccine confidence gap. Lancet. 2011; 378 (9790): 526–535.
16. Holton A., Weberling B., Clarke C.E., Smith M.J. The Blame Frame: Media Attribution of Culpability About the MMR Autism Vaccination Scare. Health Commun. 2012; 27 (7): 690–701. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2011.633158.
17. Nelson M.C., Rogers J. The right to die? Anti-vaccination activity and the 1874 smallpox epidemic in Stockholm. Soc. Hist. Med. 1992; 5 (3): 369–388.
18. Gangarosa E.J., Galazka A.M., Wolfe C.R., Phillips L.M., Gangarosa R.E., Miller E., Chen R.T. Impact of anti-vaccine movements on pertussis control: the untold story. Lancet. 1998; 351 (9099): 356–361. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)04334-1
19. Clements C.J., Greenough P., Schull D. How vaccine safety can become political — the example of polio in Nigeria. Curr. Drug Saf. 2006; 1 (1): 117–119.
20. Kwok R. The real issues in vaccine safety. Nature. 2011; 473: 436–438.
21. Teachers Kit, National Immunization Poster Contest. Canadian Coalition for Immunization Awareness & Promotion and the Public Health Agency of Canada. Available at: http://www.immunize.cpha.ca/en/events/imm-poster-contest.aspx (accessed: 20.01.2015).
Review
For citations:
Katkov A.L., Kramm M.A., Frolova Ye.Ya. PROJECT OF THE STUDY OF HEALTH MODELS AND FACTORS INFLUENCING A SANOGENIC BEHAVIOUR OF THE POPULATION IN RESPECT OF THE ASPECT OF THE VACCINE PREVENTION. Current Pediatrics. 2015;14(1):140-144. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15690/vsp.v14i1.1273
Views:
822
Email this article 
