HYGIENIC CARE OF CHILDREN’S SKIN
Abstract
Key words: children, skin, hygienic care.
(Voprosy sovremennoi pediatrii — Current Pediatrics. 2010;9(5):90-94)
About the Author
R. AdamRussian Federation
References
1. Holbrook K.A., Sybert V.P. Basic science. In: Pediatric Dermatology, 2nd edn, L.A. Schachner, R.C. Hansen. New York: Churchill Livingstone. 1995; 1–70.
2. Hachem J.P., Crumrine D., Fluhr J. et al. pH directly regulates epidermal permeability barrier homeostasis, and stratum corneum integrity cohesion. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2003; 121: 345–353.
3. Atherton D.J. A review of the pathophysiology, prevention and treatment of irritant diaper dermatitis. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2004; 20: 645–649.
4. Berg R.W. Etiology and pathophysiology of diaper dermatitis. Adv. Dermatol. 1988; 3: 75–98.
5. Andersen P.H., Bucher A.P., Saeed I. et al. Faecal enzymes: in vivo human skin irritation Contact. Dermatitis. 1994; 30: 152–158.
6. Gfatter R., Hackl P., Braun F. Effects of soap and detergents on skin surface pH, stratum corneum hydration and fat content in infants. Dermatology. 1997; 195: 258–262.
7. Tsai T.F., Maibach H.I. How irritant is water? An overview. Contact. Dermatitis. 1999; 41: 311–314.
8. Bornkessel A., Flach M., Arens–Corell M. et al. Functional assessment of a washing emulsion for sensitive skin: mild impairment of stratum corneum hydration, pH, barrier function, lipid content, integrity and cohesion in a controlled washing test. Skin. Res. Technol. 2005; 11: 53–60.
9. Ehretsmann C., Schaefer P., Adam R. Cutaneous tolerance of infant wipes by infants with atopic dermatitis, and comparison of the mildness of infant wipe and water in infant skin. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2001; 15 (Suppl. 1): 16–21.
10. Odio M., Streicher-Scott J., Hansen R.C. Disposable infant wipes: efficacy and skin mildness. Dermatol. Nurs. 2001; 13: 107–112, 117–118, 121.
11. Barel A.O., Lambrecht R., Clarys P. et al. A comparative study of the effects on the skin of a classical bar soap and a syndet cleansing bar in normal use conditions and in the soap chamber test. Skin. Res.Technol. 2001; 7: 98–104.
12. Bechor R., Zlotogorski A., Dikstein S. Effect of soaps and detergents on the pH and casual lipid levels of the skin surface. J. Appl. Cosmetol. 1988; 6: 123–128.
13. Fluhr J.W., Mao-Qiang M., Brown B.E. et al. Functional consequences of a neutral pH in neonatal rat stratum corneum. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2004; 123: 140–151.
14. Ertel K.D. Bathing the term newborn: personal cleanser considerations. New York: Marcel Dekker. 2003. P. 211–238.
15. DiNardo A., Sugino K., Wertz P. et al. Sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) induced irritant contact dermatitis: a correlation study between ceramides and in vivo parameters of irritation. Contact. Dermatitis. 1996; 35(2): 86–91.
16. Rawlings A.V., Harding C.R. Moisturization and skin barrier function. Dermatol. Ther. 2004; 17 (Suppl. 1): 43– 48.
17. De Paepe K., Hachem J.P., Vanpee E. et al. Effect of rice starch as a bath additive on the barrier function of healthy but SLS-damaged skin and skin of atopic patients. Acta. Derm. Venereol. 2002; 82: 184–186.
18. Rawlings A.V., Matts P.J. Stratum corneum moisturization at the molecular level: an update in relation to the dry skin cycle. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2005; 124: 1099–1110.
19. Madison K.C. Barrier function of the skin: ‘‘la raison d’etre’’ of the epidermis. J. Inves. Dermatol. 2003; 121: 231–241.
Review
For citations:
Adam R. HYGIENIC CARE OF CHILDREN’S SKIN. Current Pediatrics. 2010;9(5):90-94.
Email this article 
