Taste Preferences in Infants: What Defines Them?
https://doi.org/10.15690/vsp.v14i6.1480
Abstract
Breast milk is the best food for a baby of the first year of life. To pass successfully from feeding by breast milk or formula tothe introduction of complementary food, a child need to learn to perceive the taste of new products offering to him. We have evaluated mouthfeel of complementary food in 30 children aged between 4 and 12 months of life, which were divided into 3 groups according to the administered complementary food. The observation period was 30 days. The accounting of the perception of new complementary food was carried out basing on the assessment of the child's emotional status and tolerability of the complementary food product. As a result, in the first group of children the refusal of the vegetable intake (broccoli, squash) occurred to 4.1 ± 0.94 days from the start of the product administration. Intestinal colic and defecation disorders were observed in 2 (16.6%) children of this group, but they were not registered after the re-examination of infants. In the second group, the positive perception of buckwheat dairy-free porridge rich in 3 polyunsaturated fatty acids was observed ranging from 3.0 ± 0.97 days from the start of its administration. In this group 1 (8.3%) child responded by the appearance of posseting and 2 (16.6%) — by defecation disorders. After 2 weeks 1 (8.3%) child still had defecation disorders. In the third group, children, starting from the 2nd day of the intake of pureed meat, ate this product with pleasure, disorders of the gastrointestinal tract have not been reported. Thus, studied complementary food has a good taste, hypoallergenic balanced composition and allows to diversify the diet of infants.
About the Authors
I. N. ZakharovaRussian Federation
N. G. Sugyan
Russian Federation
Yu. A. Dmitrieva
Russian Federation
V. I. Svintsitskaya
Russian Federation
References
1. Complementary Feeding: A Commentary by the ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition. JPGN. 2008;46:99–110.
2. Cooke L, Wardle J, Gibson EL. The relationship between child food neophobia and everyday food consumption. Appetite. 2003;41:205–206.
3. Liley AW. Disorders of amniotic fluid. In: Pathophysiology of gestation. NS Assali (ed.). New York: Academic Press. 1972. Vol. 2. P. 157–206.
4. Beauchamp GK, Mennella JA. Flavor Perception in human infants: development and functional significance. Digestion. 2011;83(Suppl.1):1–6.
5. Tatzer E, Schubert MT, Timischl W, Simbrunger G. Discrimination of taste and preference for sweet in premature babies. Early Hum Dev. 1985;12:23–30.
6. Maone TR, Mattes RD, Bernbaum JC, Beauchamp GK. A new method for delivering a taste without fluids to preterm and term infants. Dev Psychobiol. 1990;23(2):179–191.
7. Steiner JE, Glaser D, Hawilo ME, Berridge KC. Comparative expression of hedonic impact: affective reactions to taste by human infants and other primates. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2001;25:53–74.
8. Sullivan SA, Birch LL. Infant dietary experience and acceptance of solid foods. Pediatrics. 1994;93:271–277.
9. Forestell CA, Mennella JA. Early determinants of fruit and vegetable acceptance. Pediatrics. 2007;120:1247–1254.
10. Mennella JA, Beauchamp GK. Flavor experiences during formula feeding are related to preferences during childhood. Early Hum Dev. 2002;68:71–82.
11. Blass EM, Watt LB. Suckling and sucrose induced analgesia in human newborns. Pain. 1999;83:611–623.
12. Harrison D, Stevens B, Bueno M, Yamada J, Adams-Webber T, Beyene J, Ohlsson A. Efficacy of sweet solutions for analgesia in infants between 1 and 12 months of age: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child. 2010;95:406–413.
13. Pepino MY, Mennella JA. Sucrose induced analgesia is related to sweet preferences in children but not adults. Pain. 2005; 119:210–218.
14. Menella JA, Beauchamp GK. The early development of human flavor preferences. In: Why we eat what we eat: The physiology of eating. ED Capaldi (ed.). Washington: American Psychological Association. 1996. Р. 83–112.
15. Beauchamp GK, Moran M. Acceptance of sweet and salty tastes in 2 year old children. Appetite. 1984;5:291–305.
16. Beauchamp GK, Cowart BJ, Moran M. Developmental changes in salt acceptability in human infants. Dev Psychobiol. 1986;19:17–25.
17. Stein LJ, Cowart BJ, Beauchamp GK. Salty taste acceptance by infants and young children is related to birth weight: longitudinal analysis of infants within the normal birth weight range. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006;60:272–279.
18. Crystal SR, Bernstein IL. Infant salt preference and mother’s morning sickness. Appetite. 1998;30:297–307.
19. Crystal SR, Bernstein IL. Morning sickness: impact on offspring salt preference. Appetite. 1995;25:231–240.
20. Gerrish CJ, Menella JA. Flavor variety enhances food acceptance in formula fed infants. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;73:1080–1085.
21. Carruth BR, Ziegler PJ, Gordon A, Barr SI. Prevalence of picky eaters among infants and toddlers and their caregivers’ decisions about offering a new food. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104(1):57–64.
22. Dovey TM, Staples PA, Gibson EL, Halford JCG. Food neophobia and ‘picky/fussy’ eating in children: a review. Appetite. 2008; 50(2–3):181–193.
23. Chatoor I. Feeding disorders in infants and toddlers: diagnosis and treatment. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2002;11(2):163–183.
24. Захарова ИН., Мозжухина ЛИ., Дмитриева ЮА., Свинцицкая ВИ. Продукты прикорма промышленного производства в питании детей раннего возраста. Российский вестник перинатологии и педиатрии. 2011;56(6):127–130.
25. Захарова ИН, Боровик ТЭ, Подзолкова НМ, Коровина НА, Скворцова ВА, Скворцова МЮ, Дмитриева ЮА, Мачнева ЕБ. Особенности питания беременных и кормящих женщин. М.: ГБОУ ДПО РМАПО. 2015. 61 с.
26. Захарова ИН, Дмитриева ЮА, Гордеева ЕА. От чего зависит формирование вкусовых предпочтений у младенцев? Вопросы современной педиатрии. 2012;11(6):69–74.
Review
For citations:
Zakharova I.N., Sugyan N.G., Dmitrieva Yu.A., Svintsitskaya V.I. Taste Preferences in Infants: What Defines Them? Current Pediatrics. 2015;14(6):706-709. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15690/vsp.v14i6.1480