Preview

Current Pediatrics

Advanced search

EFFICIENCY OF USING THE ADAPTED GOAT’S MILK FORMULA IN THE DIET OF HEALTHY YOUNG INFANTS: A MULTICENTER PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY

https://doi.org/10.15690/vsp.v16i3.1733

Abstract

Background. There is no doubt that it is necessary to study the efficiency of milk formulas that are introduced into the Russian market of baby food. This applies to both new products and known brands of formulas whose composition is subject to change.

Objective. Our aim was to assess the clinical efficacy of the adapted goat's milk formula in the diet of young infants.

Methods. We conducted a prospective comparative study with healthy full-term  children aged 0–5 months being on a formula (main group) or breast feeding (comparison group). The tolerability of the adapted goat's milk formula, the dynamics of anthropometric indicators, changes in body composition as well as microscopic characteristics  of stool and general clinical and biochemical parameters  of peripheral blood were assessed after 1 month.

Results. Good tolerability of the goat's milk formula was noted in 184 (96.8%) of 190 children in the main group. In the course of taking the product, the proportion of children with functional disorders of the gastrointestinal tract decreased significantly from 57 (30%) to 27 (14%) (p < 0.001). Physical development,  complete blood count results, the levels of ferritin, prealbumin and 25(OH)D in children of the main group and the comparison group (n = 71) were comparable and were within the mean age parameters. Qualitative analysis of the level of specific IgE to goat's milk proteins did not reveal any sensibilization in any of the children receiving the milk formula, either at the beginning of the study or after 1 month of taking the product.

Conclusion. The studied adapted goat's milk formula can be used in nutrition of young infants in cases of lack or absence of mother's milk.

About the Authors

Тatyana E. Borovik
National Scientific and Practical Center of Children’s Health; Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation

Moscow



Natalya N. Semyonova
National Scientific and Practical Center of Children’s Health
Russian Federation
Moscow


Olga L. Lukoyanova
National Scientific and Practical Center of Children’s Health
Russian Federation
Moscow


Natalya G. Zvonkova
National Scientific and Practical Center of Children’s Health; Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation

Moscow



Tatyana V. Bushueva
National Scientific and Practical Center of Children’s Health
Russian Federation

Moscow


Disclosure of interest: Москва


Tatyana N. Stepanova
National Scientific and Practical Center of Children’s Health
Russian Federation
Moscow


Vera А. Skvortsova
National Scientific and Practical Center of Children’s Health
Russian Federation
Moscow


Oleg S. Melnichuk
National Scientific and Practical Center of Children’s Health
Russian Federation

Moscow



Elena A. Kopyltsova
National Scientific and Practical Center of Children’s Health
Russian Federation
Moscow


Elena L. Semikina
National Scientific and Practical Center of Children’s Health
Russian Federation

Moscow



Irina N. Zakharova
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
Russian Federation

Moscow



Irina I. Rjumina
Scientific Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after academician V.I. Kulakov
Russian Federation

Moscow



Marina V. Narogan
Scientific Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after academician V.I. Kulakov
Russian Federation

Moscow



Elena V. Grosheva
Scientific Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after academician V.I. Kulakov
Russian Federation

Moscow



Roman A. Chanpherjan
Scientific and Clinical Center of Allergology and Immunology
Russian Federation

Krasnodar



Elena A. Savchenko
Scientific and Clinical Center of Allergology and Immunology
Russian Federation

Krasnodar



Tamara V. Belousova
Novosibirsk State Medical University
Russian Federation


Tamara N. Elkina
Novosibirsk State Medical University
Russian Federation


Ekaterina A. Surovkina
Novosibirsk State Medical University
Russian Federation


Yulia A. Tatarenko
Novosibirsk State Medical University
Russian Federation


References

1. Fomon SJ, editor. Nutrition of normal infants. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1993. 488 p.

2. Химический состав пищевых продуктов / Под ред. Скурихина И.М., Волгарева М.Н. Кн. 1, 2. — М.: Агропромиздат; 1987. — C. 224, 360. [Khimicheskii sostav pishchevykh produktov. Ed by Skurikhin I.M., Volgarev M.N. Vol. 1, 2. Moscow: Agropromizdat; 1987. P. 224, 360.(In Russ).]

3. Park YW, Juarez M, Ramosc M, Haenlein GFW. Physicochemical characteristics of goat and sheep milk. Small Rumin Res. 2007;68(1–2):88–113. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006.09.013.

4. Haenlein GFW. Goat milk in human nutrition. Small Rumin Res. 2004;51(2):155–163. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2003.08.010.

5. Международный свод правил по сбыту заменителей грудного молока [интернет]. ВОЗ; 1981. 38 c. [World Health Organization. International code of marketing of breast-milk substitutes. WHО; 1981. 36 p. (In Russ).] [доступ от 11.05.2017]. Доступ по ссылке http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/infantfeeding/9241541601/ru/.

6. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA). Scientific Opinion on the suitability of goat milk protein as a source of protein in infant formulae and in follow-on formulae. EFSA Journal. 2012;10(3):2603. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2603.

7. Zhou SJ, Sullivan T, Gibson RA, et al. Nutritional adequacy of goat milk infant formula for term infants: a double-blind randomised controlled trial. Br J Nutr. 2014;111(9):1641–1651. doi: 10.1017/S0007114513004212.

8. Park YW, Mahoney AW, Hendricks DG. Bioavailability of iron in goat milk compared with cow milk fed to anaemic rats. J Dairy Sci. 1986;69(10):2608–2615. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(86)80708-1.

9. Lopez Aliaga I, Alferez MJ, Barrionuevo M, et al. Influence of goat and cow milk on digestion and metabolic utilization of calcium and iron. J Physiol Biochem. 2000;56(3):201–208. doi: 10.1007/bf03179787.

10. Prosser CG, Mclaren RD, Frost D, et al. Composition of the non-protein nitrogen fraction of goat whole milk powder and goat milk-based infant and follow-on formulae. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2008;59(2):123–133. doi: 10.1080/09637480701425585.

11. Jenness R. Composition and characteristics of goat milk. J Dairy Sci. 1990;63(10):1605–1630. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)83125-0.

12. Bevilacqua C, Martin P, Candalh C, et al. Goats’ milk of defective s1-casein genotype decreases intestinal and systemic sensitization to -lactoglobulin in guinea pigs. J Dairy Res. 2001;68(2): 217–227. doi: 10.1017/s0022029901004861.


Review

For citations:


Borovik Т.E., Semyonova N.N., Lukoyanova O.L., Zvonkova N.G., Bushueva T.V., Stepanova T.N., Skvortsova V.А., Melnichuk O.S., Kopyltsova E.A., Semikina E.L., Zakharova I.N., Rjumina I.I., Narogan M.V., Grosheva E.V., Chanpherjan R.A., Savchenko E.A., Belousova T.V., Elkina T.N., Surovkina E.A., Tatarenko Yu.A. EFFICIENCY OF USING THE ADAPTED GOAT’S MILK FORMULA IN THE DIET OF HEALTHY YOUNG INFANTS: A MULTICENTER PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY. Current Pediatrics. 2017;16(3):226-233. https://doi.org/10.15690/vsp.v16i3.1733

Views: 1137


ISSN 1682-5527 (Print)
ISSN 1682-5535 (Online)