CHANGES IN URINE MICROFLORA IN CHILDREN WITH COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED URINARY TRACT INFECTION ADMITTED TO HOSPITAL BETWEEN 1990 AND 2015: A RETROSPECTIVE FULL-DESIGN STUDY OF CASE SERIES
https://doi.org/10.15690/vsp.v17i3.1890
Abstract
Background. It is necessary to study the microbial spectrum of urine in order to determine the features of the urinary tract infection (UTI) course and to make the right choice of a therapeutic approach. Objective. Our aim was to study the structure of urine microflora in children with community-acquired UTI and its change in the period from 1990 to 2015.
Methods. We conducted a continuous analysis of case histories of children admitted to hospital with UTI (pyelonephritis, cystitis, non-site specific urinary tract infection) in 1990, 2000, and 2015. We studied the results of triple (in succession) urine cultures. Shedding in a concentration of ≥ 103 cfu/ml for primary pathogens, ≥ 103 cfu/ml in boys and ≥ 104 cfu/ml in girls for secondary pathogens, ≥ 105 cfu/ml for doubtful pathogens considered to be a diagnostically significant one.
Results. Members of the family Enterobacteriaceae were the main causative agents of the UTI in 1990 (found in 90.4% of 502 samples), 2000 (in 79.7% of 632 samples), and 2015 (in 67.6% of 801 samples, df = 2, p < 0.001). Escherichia coli remained the most common microorganism, the isolation rate of which decreased from 79.9% in 1990 to 39.5% in 2015 (p < 0.001). In the period from 2000 to 2015, there was a decrease in the frequency of urine detection of Enterobacter spp. (from 5.9 to 2.5%; p < 0.001) and Citrobacter spp. (from 5.2 to 1%; p < 0.001) and, on the contrary, an increase in the isolation rate of Proteus spp. (from 7.8 to 11.7%; p = 0.005), Klebsiella spp. (from 2.8 to 12.9%; p < 0.001) and Enterococcus spp. (from 1.8 to 19.1%; p < 0.001); the latter two — due to more frequent shedding in boys (by 10.5 and 19.9%, respectively).
Conclusion. The Enterobacteriaceae members, mainly E. coli and Enterococcus spp., remained the predominant UTI pathogens in children in 1990, 2000, and 2015. The isolation rate of E. coli has declined significantly in recent years, whereas that of Klebsiella spp. and Enterococcus spp. has increased.
About the Authors
Olga A. ZhdanovaRussian Federation
Disclosure of interest: Not declared
Tatyana L. Nastausheva
Russian Federation
Disclosure of interest: Not declared
Irina V. Grebennikova
Russian Federation
Disclosure of interest: Not declared
Galina A. Batishcheva
Russian Federation
Disclosure of interest: Not declared
Irina Yu. Balalaeva
Russian Federation
Disclosure of interest: Not declared
References
1. Igna tova MS. Evolyutsiya predstavlenii o mikrobno-vospalitel’nykh zabolevaniyakh organov mochevoi sistemy. Nephrology and dialusis. 2001;3(2):218–222. (In Russ).
2. Rushton HG. Urinary tract infections in children. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1997;44(5):1133–1169. doi: 10.1016/s00313955(05)70551-4.
3. Shaikh N, Morone NE, Bost JE, Farrell MH. Prevalence of urinary tract infection in childhood: a meta-analysis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008;27(4):302–308. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31815e4122.
4. Palagin IS, Sukhorukova MV, Dekhnich AV, et al. Current state of antibiotic resistance of pathogens causing community-acquired urinary tract infections in Russia: «DARMIS» Study (2010–2011). Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2012;14(4):280–302. (In Russ).
5. Glybochko PV, Morozova OL, Morozov DA, et al. Part of parameters of immune and cytokine status at pregnant patients with purulent pyelonephritis. Saratov journal of medical scientific research. 2010;6(2):442–446. (In Russ).
6. Zorc JJ, Levine DA, Platt SL, et al. Clinical and demographic factors associated with urinary tract infection in young febrile infants. Pediatrics. 2005;116(3):644–648. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1825.
7. Kanellopoulos TA, Salakos C, Spiliopoulou I, et al. First urinary tract infection in neonates, infants and young children: a comparative study. Pediatr Nephrol. 2006;21(8):1131–1137. doi: 10.1007/s00467-006-0158-7.
8. Zagrubina AN, Kalmykova AS, Murav’eva VN. Monitoring of antibiotic susceptibility of urinary system infective agents in younger children. Medical news of the north Caucasus. 2012;25(1):29–32. (In Russ).
9. Jones RN, Barry AL. Ceftibuten (7432-S, SCH 39720): comparative antimicrobial activity against 4735 clinical isolates, beta-lactamase stability and broth microdilution quality control guidelines. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988;7(6):802–807. doi: 10.1007/bf01975055.
10. Rafal’skij VV. Antibakterial’naya terapiya ostroi gnoinoi infektsii pochek. Consilium medicum. 2006;8(4):5–8. (In Russ).
11. Korovina NA, Zakharova IN, Strachunskii LS. Prakticheskie rekomendatsii po antibakterial’noi terapii infektsii mochevoi sistemy vnebol’nichnogo proiskhozhdeniya u detei. Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2002;4(4):337–346. (In Russ).
12. Richards MJ, Edwards JR, Culver DH, Gaynes RP. Nosocomial infections in pediatric intensive care units in the United States. Pediatrics. 1999;103(4):e39–e39. doi: 10.1542/peds.103.4.e39.
13. Shevelev AN. Optimizatsiya antibakterial’noi terapii vnebol’nichnyh infektsii mochevyvodyashchikh putei u detei. [dissertation abstract] Smolensk; 2005. 22 p. (In Russ).
14. Strohmeier Y, Hodson EM, Willis NS, et al. Antibiotics for acute pyelonephritis in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(7):CD003772. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003772.pub4.
15. Goryainova AN, Zakharova IN, Korovina NA, Mumladze EB. Urinary tract infection in children: current approach to diagnosis and treatment. Russkii meditsinskii zhurnal. 2007;15(21):1533–1543. (In Russ).
16. Shvyrev AP, Serednyak VG, Zhdanova OA, et al. Bakterial’nyi monitoring flory mochi u detei s infektsiei mochevoi sistemy i printsipy vybora antibakterial’nykh preparatov. Children’s hospital. 2004;(4):28–32. (In Russ).
17. Bakteriologicheskii analiz mochi. Natsional’nye klinicheskie rekomendatsii. Moscow; 2014. (In Russ). Доступно по: http://193.232.7.120/feml/clinical_ref/0001392917S/HTML/. Ссылка активна на 13.03.2018.
18. Zakharova IN, Osmanov IM, Mumladze EB, et al. Urinary tract infection in children: what pediatrician and nephrologist have to be aware of. Meditsinskii sovet. 2015;(14):114–118. (In Russ).
19. Ni AN, Bykova OG, Ryabukhina EV, Semeshina OV. А course of acute pyelonephritis in children today. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2015;(5):241. (In Russ).
20. Conway PH, Cnaan A, Zaoutis T, et al. Recurrent urinary tract infections in children: risk factors and association with prophylactic antimicrobials. JAMA. 2007;298(2):179–186. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.2.179.
21. Montini G, Tullus K, Hewitt I. Febrile urinary tract infections in children. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(3):239–250. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1007755.
22. Cheng MF, Chen WL, Huang IF, et al. Urinary tract infection in infants caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli: comparison between urban and rural hospitals. Pediatr Nephrol. 2016;31(8):1305–1312. doi: 10.1007/s00467016-3338-0.
23. Esayan AM, Nimgirova AN. Urinary tract infections in children: etiology and pathogenesis, clinical manifestation, diagnostics, modern approaches to therapy. Current pediatrics. 2012;11(5):79–85. (In Russ). doi: 10.15690/vsp.v11i5.432.
24. Chashchina IL ,Tatochenko VK, Bakradze MD. The role of cephalosporins in urinary tract infections treatment in children. Current pediatrics. 2012;11(1):158–161. (In Russ). doi: 10.15690/vsp.v11i1.149.
25. Naseri M, Taffazoli N. Etiologies of urinary tract infections in children considering differences in gender and type of infection. JPN. 2017;5(3).
Review
For citations:
Zhdanova O.A., Nastausheva T.L., Grebennikova I.V., Batishcheva G.A., Balalaeva I.Yu. CHANGES IN URINE MICROFLORA IN CHILDREN WITH COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED URINARY TRACT INFECTION ADMITTED TO HOSPITAL BETWEEN 1990 AND 2015: A RETROSPECTIVE FULL-DESIGN STUDY OF CASE SERIES. Current Pediatrics. 2018;17(3):216-222. https://doi.org/10.15690/vsp.v17i3.1890