Brief Guidelines on Preparation of Manuscripts Containing Information on the Results of Molecular Genetic Research
https://doi.org/10.15690/vsp.v17i5.1951
Abstract
Guidelines are given on terminology, nomenclature and determination of the clinical significance of various variants of the genome nucleotide sequence. Information on the use of specialised databases and literary sources when describing and interpreting molecular genetic research data is provided.
About the Authors
Alexander A. PushkovRussian Federation
Moscow.
Disclosure of interest: Not declared
Kirill V. Savostyanov
Russian Federation
Moscow.
Disclosure of interest: Not declared
Alexey G. Nikitin
Russian Federation
Moscow.
Disclosure of interest: Not declared
References
1. Savostyanov KV, Namazova-Baranova LS, Basargina EN, et al. The new genome variants in Russian children with genetically determined cardiomyopathies revealed with massive parallel sequencing. Annals of the Russian academy of medical sciences. 2017;72(4):242–253. (In Russ). doi: 10.15690/vramn872.
2. Zadro C, Dipresa S, Zorzetti G, et al. Lactase non-persistent genotype distribution in Italy. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2017; 63(3):264–269. doi: 10.23736/S1121-421X.16.02355-2.
3. Akhtar M, Elliott P. The genetics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Glob Cardiol Sci Pract. 2018;(3):36. doi: 10.21542/gcsp.2018.36.
4. den Dunnen JT, Dalgleish R, Maglott DR, et al. HGVS Recommendations for the description of sequence variants: 2016 update. Hum Mutat. 2016;37(6):564–569. doi: 10.1002/humu.22981.
5. Bairoch A.The ENZYME database in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):304–305. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.304.
6. Taddei TH, Kacena KA, Yang M, et al. The underrecognized progressive nature of N370S Gaucher disease and assessment of cancer risk in 403 patients. Am J Hematol. 2009;84(4):208–214. doi: 10.1002/ajh.21362.
7. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405–424. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30.
8. Dong C, Wei P, Jian X, et al. Comparison and integration of deleteriousness prediction methods for nonsynonymous SNVs in whole exome sequencing studies. Hum Mol Genet. 2015; 24(8):2125–2137. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu733.
9. Flanagan SE, Patch AM, Ellard S. Using SIFT and PolyPhen to predict loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutations. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2010;14(4):533–537. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2010.0036.
Review
For citations:
Pushkov A.A., Savostyanov K.V., Nikitin A.G. Brief Guidelines on Preparation of Manuscripts Containing Information on the Results of Molecular Genetic Research. Current Pediatrics. 2018;17(5):364-366. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15690/vsp.v17i5.1951