Preview

Current Pediatrics

Advanced search

Experience of Idursulfase Beta Administration in the Child with Mucopolysaccharidosis Type II: Clinical Case

https://doi.org/10.15690/vsp.v19i5.2212

Abstract

Background. Mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS II, Hunter syndrome) is a rare hereditary lysosomal storage disease associated with iduronate-2-sulfatase deficiency. Patients with MPS II require life-long enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) to replace the deficiency of endogenous enzyme. There are two medications — idursulfase and idursulfase beta — that are licensed and recommended for these patients in Russian Federation. However, it is well known that ERT can cause hypersensitivity reactions development.

Clinical Case Description. The ERT (idursulfase in the dose of 0.5 mg/kg once per week) onset in the male patient with severe MPS II was at the age of 2.5 years. Hypersensitivity reactions (urticaria, fever) were noted incidentally, thus, the premedication with antihistamines and antipyretics was performed. The ERT side effects has aggravated at the age of 8 years despite the glucocorticosteroids admission and infusion rate reduction up to 8–16 ml/h. That is why we have changed the medication on idursulfase beta with major clinical response: we have achieved control on both disease itself and hypersensitivity reactions.

Conclusion. The availability of two ERT medications for patients with MPS II expands treatment opportunities. In case of any allergic reactions due to idursulfase, the change on idursulfase beta reduces the risk of any ERT complications with sufficient control of MPS II course.

About the Authors

Tatiana K. Kruchina
Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University; Children’s City Multidisciplinary Clinical Specialized Center of High Medical Technologies
Russian Federation

Saint Petersburg


Disclosure of interest:

Tatiana K. Kruchina — lecturing for Sanofi, Nanolek companies



Konstantin V. Bruchikov
Children’s City Multidisciplinary Clinical Specialized Center of High Medical Technologies
Russian Federation

Saint Petersburg


Disclosure of interest:

The other contributors confirmed the absence of a reportable conflict of interests



Gennady A. Novik
Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Russian Federation

Saint Petersburg


Disclosure of interest:

The other contributors confirmed the absence of a reportable conflict of interests



References

1. Hunter C. A Rare Disease in Two Brothers. Proc R Soc Med. 1917;10(Sect Study Dis Child):104–116.

2. Mukopolisakharidoz tip II: klinicheskie rekomendatsii. Assotsiatsiya meditsinskikh genetikov; Soyuz pediatrov Rossii. 2019. 60 p. (In Russ).

3. Mukopolisakharidoz II tipa u detei: klinicheskie rekomendatsii. Soyuz pediatrov Rossii. 2016. 31 p. (In Russ).

4. Burton BK, Jego V, Mikl J, Jones SA. Survival in idursulfasetreated and untreated patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type II: data from the Hunter Outcome Survey (HOS). J Inherit Metab Dis. 2017;40(6):867–874. doi: 10.1007/s10545-017-0075-x.

5. Nelson J, Crowhurst J, Carey B, Greed L. Incidence of the mucopolysaccharidoses in Western Australia. Am J Med Genet A. 2003; 123A(3):310–313. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.20314.

6. Baehner F, Schmiedeskamp C, Krummenauer F, et al. Cumulative incidence rates of the mucopolysaccharidoses in Germany. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2005;28(6):1011–1017. doi: 10.1007/s10545-005-0112-z.

7. Shevchenko R. Vpervye v Rossii sobrany i obobshcheny vse dannye po orfannym zabolevaniyam. Medvestnik. 25.02.2019. (In Russ). Av. at: https://medvestnik.ru/content/news/Vpervye-v-Rossiisobrany-i-obobsheny-vse-dannye-po-orfannymzabolevaniyam.html. Link active on 01.12.2020.

8. Buchinskaya NV, Chikova IА, Isupova YeА, et al. Modern Approaches to Therapy for Children with Mucopolysaccharidosis. Voprosy sovremennoi pediatrii — Current Pediatrics. 2014;13(3):35–43). (In Russ). doi: 10.15690/vsp.v13i3.1026.

9. Muenzer J, Jones SA, Tylki-Szymanska A, et al. Ten years of the Hunter Outcome Survey (HOS): insights, achievements, and lessons learned from a global patient registry. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017;12(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s13023-017-0635-z.

10. Muenzer J, Gucsavas-Calikoglu M, McCandless SE, et al. A phase I/II clinical trial of enzyme replacement therapy in mucopolysaccharidosis II (Hunter syndrome). Mol Genet Metab. 2007;90(3): 329–337. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2006.09.001.

11. Muenzer J, Wraith JE, Beck M, et al. A phase II/III clinical study of enzyme replacement therapy with idursulfase in mucopolysaccharidosis II (Hunter syndrome). Genet Med. 2006;8(8): 465–473. doi: 10.109701.gim.0000232477.37660.fb.

12. Sohn YB, Cho SY, Park SW, et al. Phase I/II clinical trial of enzyme replacement therapy with idursulfase beta in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis II (Hunter Syndrome). Orphanet J Rare Dis 2013;8:42. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-8-42.

13. Sohn YB, Cho SY, Lee J, et al. Safety and efficacy of enzyme replacement therapy with idursulfase beta in children aged younger than 6 years with Hunter syndrome. Mol Genet Metab. 2015; 114(2):156–160. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2014.08.009.

14. Kulikov AYu, Kostina EO. Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of drugs used in enzyme replacement therapy in the treatment of mucopolysaccharidosis type II. Pharmacoeconomics: Theory and Practice. 2019;7(2):10–15. (In Russ). doi: 10.30809/phe.2.2019.2.

15. Prikaz Minzdrava Rossii ot 29 dekabrya 2018 g. N 951n “Ob utverzhdenii standarta spetsializirovannoi meditsinskoi pomoshchi detyam pri mukopolisakharidoze II tipa (diagnostika i initsiatsiya fermentnoi zamestitel’noi terapii)”. (In Russ).

16. Kim C, Seo J, Chung Y, et al. Comparative study of idursulfase beta and idursulfase in vitro and in vivo. J Hum Genet. 2017; 62(2):167–174. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2016.133.

17. Chung YK, Sohn YB, Sohn JM, et al. A biochemical and physicochemical comparison of two recombinant enzymes used for enzyme replacement therapies of hunter syndrome. Glycoconj. 2014;31:309–315. doi: 10.1007/s10719-014-9523-0.

18. Ngu LH, Ong Peitee W, Leong HY, Chew HB. Case report of treatment experience with idursulfase beta (Hunterase) in an adolescent patient with MPS II. Mol Genet Metab Rep. 2017;12:28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2017.05.002.

19. Osipova LA, Kuzenkova LM, Namazova-Baranova LS, et al. Efficacy and safety of enzyme replacement therapy in children with mucopolysaccharidosis type I, II and VI: a single-center cohort study. Voprosy sovremennoi pediatrii — Current Pediatrics. 2018;17(1):76–84. (In Russ). doi.org/10.15690/vsp.v17i1.1858.

20. Desnick RJ, Schuchman EH. Enzyme replacement therapy for lysosomal diseases: lessons from 20 years of experience and remaining challenges. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2012;13: 307–335. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-090711-163739.

21. Barbier AJ, Bielefeld B, Whiteman DA, et al. The relationship between anti-idursulfase antibody status and safety and efficacy outcomes in attenuated mucopolysaccharidosis II patients aged 5 years and older treated with intravenous idursulfase. Mol Genet Metab. 2013;110(3):303–310. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2013.08.002.

22. Kim J, Park MR, Kim DS, et al. IgE-mediated anaphylaxis and allergic reactions to idursulfase in patients with Hunter syndrome. Allergy. 2013;68(6):796–802. doi: 10.1111/all.12155.

23. Heinzerling L, Raile K, Rochlitz H, et al. Insulin allergy: clinical manifestations and management strategies. Allergy. 2008; 63(2):148–155. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01567.x.

24. Yong PF, Malik R, Arif S, et al. Rituximab and omalizumab in severe, refractory insulin allergy. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(10): 1045–1047. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc0808282.

25. Cavelti-Weder C, Muggli B, Keller C, et al. Successful use of omalizumab in an inadequately controlled type 2 diabetic patient with severe insulin allergy. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(6):e41. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0115.

26. Mishra S, Connors L, Tugwell B. Role of omalizumab in insulin hypersensitivity: a case report and review of the literature. Diabet Med. 2018;35(5):663. doi: 10.1111/dme.13591


Review

For citations:


Kruchina T.K., Bruchikov K.V., Novik G.A. Experience of Idursulfase Beta Administration in the Child with Mucopolysaccharidosis Type II: Clinical Case. Current Pediatrics. 2020;19(5):364-370. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15690/vsp.v19i5.2212

Views: 1314


ISSN 1682-5527 (Print)
ISSN 1682-5535 (Online)