QUESTIONS OF EVALUATION OF POSTNATAL GROWTH IN PRETERM CHILDREN PART 1. GROWTH CHARTS OF PREMATURE BABIES
https://doi.org/10.15690/vsp.v12i6.879
Abstract
Evaluation of the growth of premature children is of great importance in neonatology and pediatrics. Evaluation of the growth is carried out taking into account the corrected age of preterm infants. Correction is performed during the first two years of life. This is especially important for children born before 32–33 weeks of gestation and weighing less than 1500 g. Evaluation of the growth is carried out with the use of growth charts for premature babies. Growth curves contain three measurements: weight, height and head circumference. Today, there are several growth curves. Lubchenco curves (1963), the curves of Babson and Benda (1976) have been used for more than forty decades. Currently, they do not accurately reflect the growth of a premature baby. In recent years, modern growth curves have been developed. Modern curves are developed on the basis of larger groups, taking into account gender differences. Fenton (2003) proposed growth charts for premature babies. They consist of graphs of percentiles of weight, height and head circumference. Graph compares the growth of preterm infants with fetal growth from 22 weeks to 10 weeks of postnatal age. Gender differences have a significant impact on the growth of children. Fenton (2013) established growth curves for girls and boys. Boys have higher weight, height and head circumference than girls. In assessing the growth of the fetus and the baby after birth national and racial differences should be taken into account. The growth curves of the fetus and preterm infant are important for population health assessment and evaluation of individual growth. The growth curves are used to evaluate the child's performance at birth and for the assessment of the growth of the baby after birth. The growth curves are used in intensive care and pediatric units. In order to achieve adequate growth it is necessary to carry out the correction of regimen, nursing and nutrition of a child.
About the Author
A. F. KiosovRussian Federation
Kiosov Andrey Fyodorovich, Candidate of Medical Science, Head of the Department for premature infants (2nd stage)
References
1. Nedonoshennyi rebenok. Esli rebenok rodilsya ran'she sroka. Per. s norv. Pod red. prof. E.N. Baibarinoi [Premature. If an infant was born earlier. Translated from Norway. Edited by E. N. Baibarina, professor]. Moscow, GEOTAR-Media, 2012. 192 p.
2. World Health Organization. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1995; 854: 1–452.
3. Elliman A. M., Bryan E. M., Elliman A. D., Harvey D. R. Gestational age correction for height in preterm children to seven years of age. Acta Paediatr. 1992; 81: 836–839.
4. Wang Z., Sauve R. S. Assessment of postneonatal growth in VLBW infants: selection of growth references and age adjustment for prematurity. Can. J. Public Health. 1998; 89: 109–114.
5. Guo S. S., Roche A. F., Chumlea W. C., Casey P. H., Moore W. M. Growth in weight, recumbent length, and head circumference for preterm low-birthweight infants during the first three years of life using gestation-adjusted ages. Early Hum. Dev. 1997; 47: 305–325.
6. Dancis J., O'Connell J. R., Holt L. E. A grid for recording the weight of premature infants. J. Pediatr. 1948; 33: 570–572.
7. WHO Expert Committee. The newborn infant. In Physical Status: The Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry. Geneva: World Health Organization. 1995. P. 161–262.
8. Engstrom J. L., Kavanaugh K., Meier P. P., Boles E., Hernandez J., Wheeler D., Chuffo R. Reliability of in-bed weighing procedures for critically ill infants. Neonat. Netw. 1995; 14: 27–33.
9. Sutter K., Engstrom J. L., Johnson T. S., Kavanaugh K., Ifft D. L. Reliability of head circumference measurements in preterm infants. Pediatr. Nurs. 1997; 23: 485–490.
10. Rosenberg S. N., Verzo B., Engstrom J. L., Kavanaugh K., Meier P. P. Reliability of length measurements for preterm infants. Neonat. Netw. 1992; 11: 23–27.
11. Lubchenco L. O., Hansman C., Boyd E. Intrauterine growth in length and head circumference as estimated from live births at gestational ages from 26 to 42 weeks. Pediatrics. 1966; 37: 403–408.
12. Babson S. G., Benda G. I. Growth graphs for the clinical assessment of infants of varying gestational age. J. Pediatr. 1976; 89: 814–820.
13. Fenton T. R. A new growth chart for pretermbabies: Babson and Benda’s chart updatedwith recent data and a new format. BMC Pediatr. 2003; 3: 13–22.
14. Olsen I. E., Groveman S. A., Lawson M. L., Clark R. H., Zemel B. S. New intrauterine growth curves based on United States data. Pediatrics. 2010; 125: 214–224.
15. Kramer M. S., Morin I., Yang H., Platt R. W., Usher R., McNamara H., Joseph K. S., Wen S. W. Why are babies getting bigger? Temporal trends in fetal growth and its determinants. J. Pediatr. 2002; 141: 538–542.
16. Fenton T. R., McMillan D. D., Sauve R. S. Nutrition and growth analysis of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 1990; 86: 378–383.
17. Fenton T. R., Kim J. H. A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants. BMC Pediatrics. 2013. URL: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/13/59.
18. Wrigth K., Dawson J. P., Fallis D., Vogt E., Lorch V. New postnatal growth grids for very low weight infants. Pediatrics. 1993; 91: 922–926.
19. Thomas P., Peabody J., Turnier V., Clark R. H. A new look at intrauterine growth and the impact of race, altitude, and gender. Pediatrics. 2000; 106 (2): 21.
20. Denham M., Schell L. M., Gallo M., Stark A. Neonatal size of low socioeconomic status Black and White term births in Albany County, NYS. Ann. Hum. Biol. 2011; 28 (2): 172–183.
21. Battaglia F. C., Lubchenco L. O. A practical classification of newborn infants by weight and gestational age. J. Pediatr. 1967; 71 (2): 159–163.
22. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Nutrition. Nutritional needs of lowbirthweight infants. Pediatrics. 1977; 60 (4): 519–530.
23. Adamkin D. H. Enteral nutrition and postdischarge nutrition. Nutrition management of the very low-birthweight infant: II. Optimizing. NeoReviews. 2006; 7: 608–614.
Review
For citations:
Kiosov A.F. QUESTIONS OF EVALUATION OF POSTNATAL GROWTH IN PRETERM CHILDREN PART 1. GROWTH CHARTS OF PREMATURE BABIES. Current Pediatrics. 2013;12(6):82-84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15690/vsp.v12i6.879