Automated Audiometry as the Screening of Hearing in Schoolchildren: Literature Review and Own Experience
Aleksandr V. Pashkov,
Irina V. Naumova,
Irina V. Zelenkova,
Leila S. Namazova-Baranova,
Elena A. Vishneva,
Ksenia I. Voevodina https://doi.org/10.15690/vsp.v20i3/2277
Abstract
In the era of healthcare digitalization, automation of some medical processes becomes extremely crucial, especially in situations where it is not possible to receive support quickly enough, for example, due to long wait for a specialist (queues) or absence of the needed specialist. This approach will help to use healthcare resources effectively. Automated audiometry is an example of automated diagnostic procedure based on algorithms and technical means for recording acoustic threshold in order to determine the hearing conditions. This review describes the process of automated hearing testing technology development in detail and several other system components (software, equipment, acoustic stimulation sources). The authors describe their own experience of using the automatic audiometry system. The results of comparative study of automated and clinical tests are presented.
Supporting agencies: Not specified
About the Authors
Aleksandr V. Pashkov
Research Institute of Pediatrics and Children’s Health in «Central Clinical Hospital of the Russian Academy of Sciences»;
Central State Medical Academy of Department of Presidential Affairs of Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Disclosure of interest:
Russian Federation
Moscow
Disclosure of interest:
Not declared
Irina V. Naumova
Research Institute of Pediatrics and Children’s Health in «Central Clinical Hospital of the Russian Academy of Sciences»
Russian Federation
Disclosure of interest:
Russian Federation
Moscow
Disclosure of interest:
Not declared
Irina V. Zelenkova
Research Institute of Pediatrics and Children’s Health in «Central Clinical Hospital of the Russian Academy of Sciences»
Russian Federation
Disclosure of interest:
Russian Federation
Moscow
Disclosure of interest:
Not declared
Leila S. Namazova-Baranova
Research Institute of Pediatrics and Children’s Health in «Central Clinical Hospital of the Russian Academy of Sciences»;
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University;
Belgorod National Research University
Russian Federation
Disclosure of interest:
Russian Federation
Moscow, Belgorod
Disclosure of interest:
Not declared
Elena A. Vishneva
Research Institute of Pediatrics and Children’s Health in «Central Clinical Hospital of the Russian Academy of Sciences»;
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation
Disclosure of interest:
Russian Federation
Moscow
Disclosure of interest:
Not declared
Ksenia I. Voevodina
Central State Medical Academy of Department of Presidential Affairs of Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Disclosure of interest:
Russian Federation
Moscow
Disclosure of interest:
Not declared
References
1. Mahomed F, Swanepoel W, Eikelboom RH, Soer M. Validity of automated threshold audiometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ear Hear. 2013;34(6):745–752. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000436255.53747.a4
2. Eikelboom RH, Swanepoel W, Motakef S, Upson GS. Clinical validation of the AMTAS automated audiometer. Int J Audiol. 2013;52(5):342–349. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.769065
3. Sandstrom J, Swanepoel W, Carel H, Laurent C. Smar tphone threshold audiometry in underserved primary healthcare contexts. Int J Audiol. 2016;55(4):232–238. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1124294
4. Margolis RH, Morgan DE. Automated pure-tone audiometry: an analysis of capacity, need, and benefit. Am J Audiol. 2008; 17(2):109–113. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2008/07-0047)
5. Whitton JP, Hancock KE, Shannon JM, Polley DB. Validation of a self-administered audiometry application: an equivalence study. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(10):2382–2388. doi: 10.1002/lary.25988
6. Grychyn’skii M, Khoffmann B, Yas’kevich M, et al. Rukovodstvo po audiologii i slukhoprotezirovaniyu. Lyatkovskii YaB, ed.; translation from Polish Daikhes NA, ed. Moscow; 2009. 240 p. (In Russ).
7. Margolis RH, Glasberg BR, Creeke S, Moore BC. AMTAS: automated method for testing auditory sensitivity: validation studies. Int J Audiol. 2010;49(3):185–194. doi: 10.3109/14992020903092608
8. Margolis RH, Killion MC, Bratt GW, Saly GL. Validation of the Home Hearing Test. J Am Acad Audiol. 2016;27(5):416–420. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15102
9. Masalski M, Krecicki T. Self-test web-based pure-tone audiometry: validity evaluation and measurement error analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(4): e71. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2222
10. Yao J, Wan Y, Givens GD. Using web services to realize remote hearing assessment. J Clin Monit Comput. 2010;24(1):41–50. doi: 10.1007/s10877-009-9208-6
11. Swanepoel W, Biagio L. Validity of diagnostic computer-based air and forehead bone conduction audiometry. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2011;8(4):210–214. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2011.559417
12. Brennan-Jones CG, Eikelboom RH, Swanepoel W, et al. Clinical validation of automated audiometry with continuous noisemonitoring in a clinically heterogeneous population outside a soundtreated environment. Int J Audiol. 2016;55(9):507–513. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1178858
13. Swanepoel W, Mngemane S, Molemong S, et al. Hearing assessment-reliability, accuracy, and efficiency of automated audiometry. Telemed J E Health. 2010;16(5): 557–563. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2009.0143
14. Meinke DK, Norris JA, Flynn BP, Clavier OH. Going wireless and booth-less for hearing testing in industry. Int J Audiol. 2017;56(sup1):41–51. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1261189
15. van Tonder J, Swanepoel W, Mahomed-Asmail F, et al. Automated smartphone threshold audiometry: validity and time efficiency. J Am Acad Audiol. 2017;28(3):200–208. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16002
16. Khoza-Shangase K, Kassner L. Automated screening audiometry in the digital age: exploring uHear and its use in a resourcestricken developing country. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29(1):42–47. doi: 10.1017/S0266462312000761
17. Foulad A, Bui P, Djalilian H. Automated audiometry using apple iOS-based application technology. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;149(5):700–706. doi: 10.1177/0194599813501461.
18. Voss SE, Herrmann BS. How does the sound pressure generated by circumaural, supra-aural, and insert earphones differ for adult and infant ears? Ear Hear. 2005;26(6):636–650. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000189717.83661.57
19. Olusanya BO, Davis AC, Hoffman HJ. Hearing loss grades and the International classification of functioning, disability and health. Bull World Health Organ. 2019;97(10):725–728. doi: 10.2471/BLT.19.230367
Review
For citations:
Pashkov A.V., Naumova I.V., Zelenkova I.V., Namazova-Baranova L.S., Vishneva E.A., Voevodina K.I. Automated Audiometry as the Screening of Hearing in Schoolchildren: Literature Review and Own Experience. Current Pediatrics. 2021;20(3):245-250. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15690/vsp.v20i3/2277
Views:
738
Email this article 
